Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 6921 - 6940
of 15,523
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2015, 9:30 pm
One of these cases, Shelley v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 11:42 am
” The plaintiff in Hutson v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
In R v Marcott, Justices Arbour and Osler concurred that an element of the offense was “that deception is practiced…and that the person undertaking to tell fortunes represents that he has the power to do so with the intention that such representation should be believed”, and “[where an] assertion, or undertaking [to predict the future] is made for reward…with intent to deceive, the offense is complete. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 1:09 am
In R v Del Basso and Goodwin [2010] EWCA Crim 1119, payment of VAT and other expenses were held irrelevant for the purposes of assessment of benefit. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 1:36 pm
You don't need to do the math to figure the hourly rate that those figures yield. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 12:09 pm
The Maryland Court of Special Appeals recently decided Johnson v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 2:04 pm
Yet I can’t see any reason why, for example, one would believe judges would be especially good at figuring out the right balance between the acknowledged state interest in preserving human life and the “fundamental right” to terminate pregnancy, as the Supreme Court has been doing since Roe v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 12:55 pm
To the extent that Defendant has freely entered the public square and “thrust himself into the vortex of th[ese] public issue[s],” Gertz v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:52 am
Wells discussed recent developments in Al Warafi v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:00 am
In Merlin Partners LP v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:26 am
Kalitan $4 million in non-economic damages, but that figure was reduced by the trial court post-verdict to $2 million under the non-economic damages caps found in Fla. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:26 am
Kalitan $4 million in non-economic damages, but that figure was reduced by the trial court post-verdict to $2 million under the non-economic damages caps found in Fla. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 8:26 am
Kalitan $4 million in non-economic damages, but that figure was reduced by the trial court post-verdict to $2 million under the non-economic damages caps found in Fla. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 7:03 am
The Appellate Court of Illinois chimed in a few weeks ago, in Szafranski v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 4:39 am
Church & Dwight Co. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 4:36 pm
Australia has no equivalent to the “public figure” doctrine in United States defamation law. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 10:37 pm
Monday the Supreme Court issued its opinions (yes, that's intentionally plural) in Glossip v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:43 am
Baker v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:28 am
We figure we might as well post some of these on here. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 12:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
