Search for: "High v State"
Results 6921 - 6940
of 35,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2020, 8:33 am
The justices once again did not act on several high-profile petitions for review that they considered at last week’s conference, including a case involving whether the state of Washington violated a florist’s constitutional rights by requiring her to provide flowers for same-sex weddings despite her religious objections and a challenge to a 2018 rule that expanded the definition of “machinegun” under federal law to include “bump-stocks” –… [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 3:02 am
Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) proposes to regulate social media bots, or to put it differently, to regulate a form of speech carried on through automated mechanisms [John Samples, Cato] “The State of New Jersey Wants to Subsidize News. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 3:10 am
Wright/WLF, earlier] Dear SCOTUS: certification of a class action should be based on admissible evidence [Andrew Grossman, Ilya Shapiro, and Meggan DeWitt on Cato cert amicus brief in Taylor Farms v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
The complaint states that "Nike uses these trademarks on shoes and apparel as trademarks of Nike's high quality products. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 2:02 pm
MySpace and Doe v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:31 am
by Dennis Crouch In WesternGeco v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 1:15 am
Over the years of this Apple v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:56 pm
City of Irvine v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 10:09 am
In that case, a high school student wanted to be an actor. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:00 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 7:03 am
The employees’ were granted a request for direct appellate review to the state high court of two questions: (1) Does G. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 4:00 pm
(Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 9:05 am
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 10:25 am
Cappello v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:40 am
First, in dismissing the alternative claim, the High Court stated that the criteria for proving constructive total loss under the Act were that (1) the subject matter must be abandoned and (2) an actual total loss must appear unavoidable. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 12:08 pm
In Bedell v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 9:31 pm
Lumberjack Pass Amusements, LLC v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:24 am
In 1991, in the case of Chaves County Home Health Service Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 7:40 am
New York's high court today threw out a plaintiff's verdict in a medical malpractice case because the court refused the request of the plainitff to poll the jury at the time the verdict was rendered.The decision in Duffy v. [read post]
