Search for: "House v. Close" Results 6921 - 6940 of 7,520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2011, 3:45 am by Rob Robinson
| WSJ Law Blog - on.wsj.com/t3yBOo (Jennifer Smith) Litigants Beware: Create Reasonable Document Requests or Else You Might Be Paying for it in the Future - bit.ly/rOLE6j (Mike Hamilton) More “Top” Predictions: Top Ten eDiscovery Predictions for 2012 - bit.ly/rRX8nt (Dean Gonsowski) ‘Pippins v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
The Charter itself can only be changed by a two thirds majority in the House of Commons, the House of Lords and the Scottish Parliament and with the unanimous agreement of the PRP Board. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 2:48 am
Being unable to access the same databases as lawyers who have the advantage of large resources in-house, what resources do you rely on to prepare your cases? [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 9:09 am by ngarnett
   For more on this argument, see this interesting article on city v. suburban fortunes in the current recession. [read post]
19 May 2012, 7:53 am by Paul Jacobson
It is shocking as well that some media houses find this distasteful work worth displaying on their websites and are eager to publish it repeatedly. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:02 am by Jeff Gamso
  And unless he's flat-out lying about what's in the record, it seems pretty clear that to kill Cooper under these circumstances "comes perilously close to simple murder" as Justice Blackmun put it (dissenting, alas) in Herrera v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:57 am by Gwendolyn Whidden
ISRAEL-HAMAS WAR — INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE The International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Thursday issued additional provisional measures in South Africa v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
. - Chris Anderson, South Coast Today, March 4, 2010 City officials are pushing for the remaining funds in the New Bedford Harbor trust to be allocated to city projects, arguing that the money should be spent as close as possible to where the damage from the long-running contamination of the harbor occurred. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am by Will Baude
(Will Baude) Yesterday I posted the amicus brief that I and a group of constitutional law scholars filed in the Court’s recess appointments case, Noel Canning. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 9:53 am by William McGrath
These cases and other matters from the last month are discussed in greater detail after the jump.The SEC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am by centerforartlaw
To demonstrate the stark difference between their publicness and exclusiveness, assets of public benefit organizations are distributed to other public benefit organizations when they are dissolved,[15] whereas the assets of closing clubs can go to the members of the entity. [read post]
22 Nov 2014, 1:51 pm
Citing the Supreme Court’s 1985 precedent of Heckler v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 11:01 am by Jon L. Gelman
Our phased reopening in conditions where case incidence remains high ensures a long and slow recovery, not a V-shaped recovery. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 11:58 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]