Search for: "IN RE GUESS"
Results 6921 - 6940
of 16,480
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2013, 3:10 am
But since no one knows what initial interest confusion is, and defendants can always introduce their single-digit CTR, I think we're done with the argument that keyword ads create initial interest confusion, at least in the Tenth Circuit. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
If you guessed this, you’d be right, you’d be amazing, and to celebrate your amazingness, if you’re ever in town, and you take an oath you don’t have inside knowledge, aren’t always this amazing, and didn’t peak at the above link or the tags below before answering, I’ll buy you a drink of something. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 11:20 am
In this case, one active judge (we’re guessing that was probably Judge Chin) did ask for a vote, and the bottom line was 10-2 in favor of not reviewing the earlier panel decision. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 10:05 pm
Alerts may be re-broadcast at specific intervals in the targeted geographic locations, in order to reach as many devices as possible. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:51 pm
Care to guess who they might be? [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:51 pm
Care to guess who they might be? [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 12:42 am
See if you can guess which ones they were! [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 9:05 am
My guess is not many. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 9:05 am
My guess is not many. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 9:26 am
No, we’re kidding. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 7:56 am
My guess is that they will push for punitive damages. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 7:24 am
So, now I think we’re probably getting somewhere closer to the truth, if I was forced to hazard a guess on this one. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:54 pm
The proposed approach merely affords the agency, the IG, the DOJ and whistleblowers the opportunity to second guess the contractor’s judgment – or even the adequacy of the process pursuant to which it reached that judgment – and to seek administrative or punitive recourse against the contractor for mistakes in reports that would be unnecessary but for paragraph (e). [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:44 pm
They’re not necessarily consistent in their criticism of Lang’s take, but quite a lot of them are quite insightful. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:06 am
Take a guess. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
It was fun to flip through all these papers, and now they’re in the recycling bin. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:50 am
We’re pleased to report that all of last week’s relists have found loving homes. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:50 am
I guess it is a step in the right direction that current surveillance activities, being rooted in digital surveillance, have at least rendered the break-in part unnecessary. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 5:33 am
I guess we’re all supposed to assume that repair software is like a shady auto shop; we believe its dire predictions at our peril? [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 3:20 pm
Having re-examined his life through the lens of his own book, Mr. [read post]
