Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 6921 - 6940
of 18,112
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
(Oxford University Press, 2008), page 2] In Canada, the prohibition against lawyers being employed to provide services to the customers of their employers[ii] can be overcome by a Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms “public freedom for access to the courts” argument based upon s. 2(b)’s, “freedom of opinion and expression”; see: Re Southam Inc. and The Queen (No. 1), 1983 CanLII 1707 (ONCA), 41 O.R. (2d) 113; plus an extended use of, Endean v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 1:00 am
Miller & Ors v Ministory of Justice; O’Brien v Ministry of Justice; and Walker v Innospec Ltd & Ors, heard 8-9 Mar 2017. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm
Appreciate you are busy but it would be v helpful to have answers to qs about party status and existence/format of jmt. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 2:57 pm
California Chamber of Commerce, et al. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
In Hively v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 12:30 pm
But we’re handicapping that as a hold for another redistricting case out of the same state, McCrory v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 2:31 pm
The reader is basically left entirely in the dark about what we're talking about.The opinion also, strangely, feels the need to drop a footnote that defines what a credit card is. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 4:03 am
” But then, while lawyers tend to use comprehensible language, we’re becoming increasingly alone and isolated. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 12:56 am
So far, my impression is that the court could easily decide either way, but what would be in the interest of justice is that Samsung gets the chance to make its "article of manufacture" case before a new jury (a jury would be needed in any event for the re-retrial, so justice would be available at almost no incremental cost here). [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:14 pm
’” “Now we’re getting down deep . . . [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 10:53 am
In Rancosky v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 10:43 am
Steven V. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:30 am
The band is well known in legal circles due to their battle with the United States Trademark Office with In Re Tam, which is now before the Supreme Court of the United States and known as Lee v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 4:55 am
But today “sex” has a broader meaning than the genitalia you’re born with. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:55 am
The opinion in Hively v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:01 am
What was your interview with Justice Scalia like? [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:26 am
You’re a piece of sh*t“. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 8:29 am
One of those was State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 11:52 am
As Chief Justice Roberts recognized in a 2014 case, Riley v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 4:05 am
Cohen, A Genesis of Conflict: The Zero-Sum Mindset, (17 Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 427 (2016)).Ioana Cismas, Reflections on the Presence and Absence of Religious Actors in Transitional Justice Processes: On Legitimacy and Accountability, (Roger Duthie and Paul Seils, eds., Justice Mosaics: How Context Shapes Transitional Justice in Fractured Societies (ICTJ, 2017), pp. 302-343.Nuno Ferreira, Commentary on the Re-Written Judgment in R (on the… [read post]
