Search for: "In re R. F."
Results 6921 - 6940
of 10,010
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2007, 6:10 pm
(F) Education, scholarships, or fellowships. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 12:30 am
(If you're filing Form 1040EZ, something's wrong. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 2:00 am
, 627 F.3d 869 (Fed. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 12:37 pm
R. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 8:43 am
Court Rules, comment 1.1 on R. 4:50-1 (2003)). [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Michael F. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
McDonough, 464 F.3d 1256 (11th Cir. 2006) ......................................................3, 10-12 In re Greenberg, 2006 WL 1594202 (11th Cir. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 3:30 pm
Knupfer (In re PW, LLC), the Ninth Circuit BAP held that a senior secured creditor's credit bid, in an amount less than the aggregate value of all liens against the property in question, did not satisfy the requirements of Section 365(f) and permit the sale to be "free and clear" of the existing junior liens on the property and reversed the bankruptcy court's order on appeal. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
In re Pharmatrak, Inc. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Co. v Payton Lane Nursing Home, Inc., 704 F Supp 2d 177, 192 [ED NY 2010]). [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 11:18 am
They’re something else altogether and outside the law. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:47 am
July 3, 2008); In re Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 7:20 am
The best vascular surgery program in the world can’t help you if there’s no surgeon available or if you’re 150 miles away when your aortic aneurysm ruptures. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 2:29 pm
Newman, 773 F.3d 438 (2d Cir. 2014) (“Newman”). [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:34 pm
He very graciously agrees to not turn up on the day of the proposed eviction and just re-apply for a new warrant, which will buy me the time I need. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:56 am
Throughout the opinion, the court kept reiterating this standard to re-emphasize the discretion given to agencies in these matters. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 1:13 pm
Code § 15306.5(c); In re Neuton, 922 F.2d at 1384. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 7:08 am
See In re Spiller 500 F.2d at 1178. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 5:12 pm
Or one can say that the ancient teachings were wrong from the outset, which makes one have to face the MuslimLawProf’s question: “[I]f you’re willing to declare the classical doctors engaged in profound and fundamental error on this point, if you’re willing to argue that this was a fundamental and total breach of their function as interpreters of the Word, as betrayal of their human instincts, a gutting of deep and fundamental principle, a… [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 12:17 am
R v. [read post]
