Search for: "L & I" Results 6921 - 6940 of 36,334
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2023, 7:55 pm by Jack Bogdanski
I needed to save some of my pocket money for L&M cigs, after all. [read post]
3 May 2007, 9:28 am
  I'm not sure I'm qualified to bloviate on this topic, as it seems to have more than its share of complexities, but as this is a blog, I shall go ahead. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:30 am by azatty
Padilla, Director, American Indian Law Center, Inc.; Mary L. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
Although this may disappoint South Africa’s supporters, I do think the Court was wise to show this restraint, particularly as one thinks about the nature of the provisional measures phase of a case like this. [read post]
26 Nov 2021, 1:41 pm by Stéphane Erickson
En vertu de la partie I, les entrepreneurs dépendants – qui se situent quelque part entre ce que l’on définit traditionnellement comme des « employés » et les « entrepreneurs indépendants » – sont protégés, ce qui signifie que certains entrepreneurs pourraient bénéficier des droits du travail, comme le droit de se syndiquer. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 2:48 pm
Surpris et encouragé de l'éveil technologique du Barreau, je me suis empressé d'installer ce logiciel sur mon fringuant Outlook...Voici donc mes commentaires que j'ai formulés auprès du Bâtonnier et de Prospector Network, la compagnie qui vend ce logiciel:Premièrement, sans entrer dans… [read post]
Le décret 810 précise que cette interdiction s’applique i) dans un immeuble autre qu’un immeuble d’habitation, ii) que cet immeuble constitue un lieu qui accueille le public ou non. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 5:22 pm by Lawrence Solum
The Download of the Week is  Unlimited War and Social Change: Unpacking the Cold War's Impact by Mary L. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 11:44 am by Elie Mystal
She’s a former lawyer, so l think she’ll notice this problematic invitation:You know, this wouldn’t have happened if they weren’t trying to limit access to the ceremony. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:07 am
While this case involves the constitutional privacy rights of public employees, I hold out a glimmer of hope that the Supremes will give broader insight into the rights of all employers to keep tabs on how employees are using their technology while on-the-clock. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 1:40 pm
I ‘m afraid I just can't understand all this talk about "silence," and I could use some help here. [read post]