Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 6921 - 6940 of 21,107
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2018, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The court reaffirmed the rule of law that strict liability is imposed only where the product is used by an intended user.Here, where the Defendant manufacturer’s owner’s manual and warning stated that the product was not for use by children under 12, a 6 year old injured party was deemed not to be an intended user of the product as a matter of law.The court otherwise held that a manufacturer cannot be held liable for failing to design a… [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Walter Dellinger
” Thus, “a necessity to defend a criminal trial and to attend court … would interfere with the President’s unique official duties. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 11:55 pm by admin
They did nothing wrong except to be in the Defendants path when they died or were injured. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 11:55 pm by admin
They did nothing wrong except to be in the Defendants path when they died or were injured. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 7:44 am by Bill Perry
 This complaint and the evidence supporting the complaint are not served on the defendants. [read post]
16 Jun 2018, 9:22 am by Bryce Angell
A defendant will probably be found liable for a plaintiff’s damages if an “average” individual in a comparable circumstance would have behaved differently and not have breached the duty of care. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 12:42 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Therefore, the Plaintiff alleges that the Defendant is vicariously liable for every instance that the photograph was downloaded from their account by a third party. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 11:58 am by Edward Smith
Two Killed in Amador County Accident I’m Ed Smith, an Ione personal injury lawyer. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 8:18 am by madmin
Therefore, it would make sense that the “drug dealer” (or “drug distributor”) should be criminally liable for the drug buyer’s death under felony-murder legal doctrine. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 8:18 am by madmin
Therefore, it would make sense that the “drug dealer” (or “drug distributor”) should be criminally liable for the drug buyer’s death under felony-murder legal doctrine. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 4:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, defendants argue that the Appellate Division’s dismissal of plaintiffs claim against Mack Trucks was contrary to the law and the facts of this case, and therefore an appeal would likely have been successful. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
Thus, in Malesko the Court held that corporate defendants may not be held liable in Bivens actions. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 1:47 pm by highrank
The following forms of evidence are not admissible: Defendants Liability Insurance Personal injury cases determine if one party is liable to another for money, as compensation for injuries or damages. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 12:03 pm by jordanlulich3@gmail.com
For example, if there are three defendants, the trier of fact may state that Defendant A is 30% liable for negligence, Defendant B is 40% liable for negligence, and Defendant C is 30% liable for negligence. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 9:25 am by Cristina Wendel
” The trial judge held that she could only find the defendant liable for the portion of the plaintiff’s loss occasion by the defendants fault, not for any loss that was contributed to by the repair shop’s fault. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 9:20 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The insurance company denied the plaintiff’s claim and sought a declaratory judgment from the court, stating that the company was not liable because the accident did not trigger the defendants uninsured motorist coverage. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 9:20 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The insurance company denied the plaintiff’s claim and sought a declaratory judgment from the court, stating that the company was not liable because the accident did not trigger the defendants uninsured motorist coverage. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 9:08 am by John C. Manoog III
The Court’s Decision The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court granted the defendants’ application for direct appellate review. [read post]