Search for: "Lively v. State"
Results 6921 - 6940
of 29,024
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2019, 3:51 am
Doe, a cert petition arising from a police officer’s lawsuit against a Black Lives Matter organizer. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 4:12 pm
In Tagiyev and Huseynov v. [read post]
21 Dec 2019, 6:07 pm
See Koch v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:08 pm
By: Jinal Sharma, Legal Intern Earlier this month, in Capron v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 11:49 am
As stated above, they have not. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 9:09 am
States like Maine will be a haven for abortion access if Roe v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
On January 15, the court issued its first 5-4 decision of the term, in Stokeling v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 5:01 am
Mckesson, the Baton Rouge Black Lives Matter case.] [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Harris), state or federal court (see his dissent in Michigan v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
United States (Birthright Citizenship) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlState of Minnesota v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 5:01 am
This demonstration was one in a string of protests across the country, often associated with Black Lives Matter, concerning police practices…. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
This paper, which updates several key components of our January 2019 tax conformity paper,[1] examines how states have approached provisions closely tied to the competitiveness and neutrality of the tax code, including taxation of GILTI, provision of the deduction for Foreign-Derived Intangible Income (FDII), inclusion of income deemed repatriated under § 965, the first-year expensing of short-lived capital investment under § 168(k), and the § 163(j) net interest… [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:07 pm
Eidem v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:53 pm
It noted that as the Fourth Circuit stated in Miller v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:51 pm
See Kijowska v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:42 pm
In Stone v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 3:30 pm
We answer those questions as follows: First, there is a live case or controversy because the intervenor-defendant states have standing to appeal and, even if they did not, there remains a live case or controversy between the plaintiffs and the federal defendants. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 1:23 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 12:00 pm
United States (Birthright Citizenship) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlState of Minnesota v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 7:19 am
State v. [read post]