Search for: "MAY v. US "
Results 6921 - 6940
of 120,415
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2012, 11:22 am
In Green v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
On May 10, FDA published a discussion paper on this topic and requested feedback “to enhance mutual learning and to establish a dialogue with FDA stakeholders” and to “help inform the regulatory landscape in this area. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
So held the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, in its September 26, 2014 decision in Anderson v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 12:09 am
Herbko Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:03 am
He tells us that he "think[s] the Federal Circuit can help minimize harm" that may otherwise be caused by the Supreme Court's decision in Bilski v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 3:25 am
In Fu v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
In its 6-3 decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 2:05 pm
The Supreme Court yesterday decided Town of Greece v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:20 pm
In the case of Soppet v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:34 am
The three-judge based their decision on a 1976 US Supreme Court ruling in Federal Energy Administration v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 9:57 am
In Ross v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
SHIREY V. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 2:09 pm
See Salameh v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
"Findlaw summaries [may] include opoinions that have not yet been released for publication and may be subject to modification, correction or withdrawl. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 9:43 am
The decision in Webster v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 6:00 am
Healthy City Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 9:07 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 6:32 am
Zoning — Permitted use — Gas station On May 1, 2019, appellee/cross-appellant 1788/405/Trojan Investments, LLC c/o 1788 Holdings, LLC (“1788 Holdings”) filed an application for Schematic Development Plan SDP-8174-2019 (the “Plan”) to construct a Wawa convenience store and automobile filling station at 405 S. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 8:27 am
Civil litigation — No substantial justifications — Sanctions This appeal requires us to explore when pursuing a legal theory without substantial justification may result in an award of sanctions pursuant to Rule 1-341 against (1) an attorney and (2) a party. [read post]
