Search for: "Mark Case" Results 6921 - 6940 of 70,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2012, 10:41 am by Mike Scarcella
Those recordings were central in the prosecution of the sting case, which was the largest-ever Foreign Corrupt Practice Act case against individuals. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Kreisman Law Offices has been handling assisted living lawsuits, wrongful death cases, nursing home abuse cases, nursing home bed sore lawsuits and nursing home negligence cases for individuals, families and their loved ones who have been injured, harmed or killed by the negligence or carelessness of a medical provider for more than 40 years, in and around Chicago, Cook County and its surrounding areas, including Cicero, River Grove, Schiller Park, Schaumburg, Des Plaines,… [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 3:29 am
The Board, however, pointed out once again that each case must be decided on its own merits based on the record then before the Board. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 7:07 am by Söğüt Atilla
If you missed the IPKat last week and want to stay up to date on the latest IP events, job opportunities, and key trade mark and copyright cases, join this Kat in catching up! [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:55 am
This was the case, even where pharmaceutical preparations were available to consumers over the counter, since those goods related to their health. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:32 am by centerforartlaw
Yuga posited that it should prevail in its claim based on several grounds:[7] (1) the lawful and enforceable possession of the BAYC marks, (2) the unauthorized employment of these marks by the defendants in a manner likely to confuse consumers, (3) Yuga’s entitlement to reparations and injunctive relief, and (4) the exceptional nature of the case warranting enhanced damages. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:31 pm by lawmrh
Using Mark’s criteria helps avoid taking on representation of merit-less cases or of matters that don’t pass the laugh test. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:28 am by Susan Perera
 On appeal to the Trademark Trial & Appeal Board in 1988, the Board held that that functionality is a utilitarian feature and that in this case making a product more attractive is not functional. [read post]
2 May 2016, 3:15 am
The Board, however, found those cases inapplicable because of the disparate nature of the involved goods. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 2:26 am
A cancellation petitioner bears the initial burden to establish a prima facie case of no distinctiveness. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 11:39 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Roch Market” mark thus failed.But those cases were vastly different. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 5:48 am by Eugene Volokh
Rev. 212, 247 n.125 (2012) (collecting additional cases where dilution by tarnishment has been found, all of which involve the defendant’s association of a mark with sex or illegal drugs). [read post]