Search for: "People v. Powers" Results 6921 - 6940 of 15,377
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2007, 2:17 am
See also Burson v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 10:15 am by Elie Mystal
The Volokh Conspiracy notes that people will be much less likely to accept Supreme intervention in a post Bush v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 11:04 am by Don Cruse
Does this pipeline company — which agreed with the Railroad Commission to carry other people’s products as well as its own — qualify as a “common carrier” so as to be granted eminent domain powers under Texas law? [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:11 pm by Will Baude
—the challengers' theory of federal Indian power with the Court's cases. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:26 am by INFORRM
There are several other reasons why the decision of the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers was aberrant. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 9:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel 3: CopyrightSarah Polcz, Loyalties v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 11:32 am by Giles Peaker
The Upper Tribunal goes on to note that none of this should have happened in view of the guidance given in Avon Ground Rents Ltd v Child (2018) UKUT 204 (LC) (our note). [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:45 am by Kelly Buchanan
June 13, 2016, was the 50th anniversary of the famous Supreme Court decision in the case of Miranda v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:30 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Constitution sets forth that only Congress has the power to regulate interstate commerce. [read post]
3 Oct 2020, 8:33 pm by Katie Barlow
Under guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, people who show no symptoms must isolate for 10 days after a positive test, and people with symptoms must isolate for at least 10 days after symptoms first appear. [read post]