Search for: "State v. C. S."
Results 6921 - 6940
of 37,717
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2020, 6:17 am
By Michael Snyder and Laura Lipschutz On Thursday, April 23, 2020, in the case Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 5:47 am
Walker's opinion in Friday's decision in NRA v. [read post]
[Guest Post] 21 and illegal in all states? The German Pelham court confirms when sampling is illegal
5 May 2020, 1:20 am
Here's what he has to say on Pelham:Norwegian RectangleAlan HuiTwo decades into the Pelham v Hütter saga, the German Federal Court of Justice has confirmed when sampling is illegal under German copyright law. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
This specific issue has been tackled by the Court of Justice in GC et al v CNIL (C-136/17) finding that Article 9’s permitting of exceptions “necessary for reasons of substantial public interest, on the basis of Union or Member State law” (GDPR, art. 9(2)(g)) could be invoked by Google even in the absence of any Union or Member State statutory provision providing for this and even apparently as regards criminal-related data as specified… [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:10 pm
Altman v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:10 pm
Altman v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 1:29 pm
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 10:20 am
State v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:46 am
This morning—in connection with the Supreme Court’s inaugural teleconference arguments—the Court announced it would review the Sixth Circuit’s decision in CIC Services v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:23 am
Google YouTube Isn’t a State Actor (DUH)–PragerU v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:11 am
In this post, Kenny Henderson, David Bridge, Jessica Foley and Devina Shah of CMS preview the appeal to be heard by the Supreme Court on 12-13 May 2020 in the matter of Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:05 am
[C.] [read post]
4 May 2020, 3:58 am
” At Freedom Forum, Tony Mauro talks to Bruce Collins of C-SPAN about why “the court’s unprecedented action will be a big event. [read post]
4 May 2020, 2:07 am
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
3 May 2020, 4:16 pm
IPKat had a post “Trade marks and mobile apps: the PlanetArt v Photobox saga draws to a close (in PlanetArt’s favour)”. [read post]
3 May 2020, 10:48 am
” (Climie v Wood [1869] LR 4 Exch 328) ” Similarly in Boswell v Crucible Steel Ltd [1925] 1 KB 119, windows to a warehouse, windows were found to be part of the structure, rather than ‘landlord’s fixtures’. [read post]
3 May 2020, 7:19 am
State, No. 2018-KA-01341-COA (Miss. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:14 am
(c) Answer to Issue: No. [read post]
2 May 2020, 4:47 pm
Centre for Democracy and the Rule of Law v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
United States, 290 U.S. 13, 16 (1933)); see United States v. [read post]
