Search for: "State v. House" Results 6921 - 6940 of 28,800
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2009, 5:15 pm by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
State Senator Ron Jelinek (R - Berrien County) has introduced a bill in Lansing to abolish adultery as a crime. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 1:20 pm
The bill, which has a companion in the Michigan House, has been referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:54 am by NL
We will then discharge our duty (to house you) under s.193(7) Housing Act 1996. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:54 am by NL
We will then discharge our duty (to house you) under s.193(7) Housing Act 1996. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:00 am by ASAD KHAN
The FtT stated that the burden of proof in immigration appeals is on the appellant and the standard of proof is the balance of probabilities. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:30 am by Dave
The problem for Newham is/was that their allocations policy states that allocations medical assessments are to be done in-house by an officer as part of a particular team. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:30 am by Dave
The problem for Newham is/was that their allocations policy states that allocations medical assessments are to be done in-house by an officer as part of a particular team. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:18 am by Eric Goldman
Homeaway * Another Collision of Housing Regulations and Online Innovation–SF Housing Rights Committee v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:18 am by Eric Goldman
Homeaway * Another Collision of Housing Regulations and Online Innovation–SF Housing Rights Committee v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:01 am
This conclusion added little to the analysis because the Supreme Court has held that the police power and the public use clause are "coterminous," Hawaii Housing Auth. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
United States] Housing disparate impact theory, dodged by administration last time around, returns to Court [Bloomberg, Daniel Fisher; Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 8:40 am by Peter Groves
This opens up the possibility of the loom operator providing the essential craftsmanship contribution to the work.The judge reviewed the cases, from Hensher v Restawile (1976) to Vermaat v Boncrest (2001), not to mention Lucasfilm (2008), concluding that the Hensher court (the House of Lords, remember) would have found against the present claimant: the fabric was not a work of artistic craftsmanship - the craftsmanship element being lacking. [read post]