Search for: "State v. S. R. R." Results 6921 - 6940 of 71,795
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2018, 6:03 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court frames his argument this way:Akassy, who seeks to sue his former attorneys, states "my life is in a cl[ea]r and present danger as I have been subjected to abuses, physical assaults and denied my prisoner's rights by overzealous Correctional Officers for filing grievances and reporting abuses to law enforcement authorities and Human Rights Organizations" and "because of the nature of my alleged criminal case and the legal malpractice. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Implications for Public Administration from Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
”And since his level of “dangerousness” warranted “confinement rather than strict and intense supervision,” the AD2 saw no reason to disturb the underlying outcome.That had to rub Timothy the wrong way …# # #DECISIONMatter of State of New York v Timothy R. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 9:19 am
Taranto, Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.Following his keynote address, Judge Taranto will join in a panel discussion with Judges James V. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Faden, PH.D., et al., Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners, EMW Women’s Surgical Center, P.S.C., et al. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 6:09 am
As FoIB Holly R tips us:"...like other pieces of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, it’s not so simple. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 4:40 am by Jon Hyman
“[R]andom `looks’” and eye rolls in Kelleher’s direction may be unpleasant to tolerate but, without more, they are not sufficiently severe to affect the terms, conditions, or privileges of Kelleher’s employment. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:20 am
Tellinghuisen, the Attorney General for the state of South Dakota, whose argument in South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 1:08 am
On Friday, the Supreme Court of Canada released its long awaited decision in Keays v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R & S Pilling t/as Phoenix Engineering v UK Insurance Ltd, heard 13 Dec 2018. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:00 am by INFORRM
Moreover, it stated that Article 8 cannot be relied upon to complain of a loss of reputation which is the foreseeable consequences of a person’s actions such as the commission of a criminal offence (citing Sidabras and Džiautas v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 9:05 pm
Earlier this afternoon, we filed this reply brief in Jimenez v. [read post]