Search for: "Young v. State" Results 6921 - 6940 of 8,892
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2011, 2:43 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Panel decisions in favor of criminal defendants are now sometimes corrected en banc, rather than going up to the Supreme Court to add to the Ninth's notorious reversal rate.One such decision was a fairly standard case on premeditation, United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
Kansas Power & Light Co., 828 P.2d 923, 931 (Kan. 1992); Young v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:21 am
 Continuing the saga of Cautious v IPOff and the Case of the Robot Octopus, it awaits your pleasure here. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 5:03 pm by Randall Reese
 A copy of the rejection motion can be found here.Anchor Blue is being represented in the bankruptcy cases by the law firms of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP and Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLP. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm by Jeff Vail
 Richard Susskind has argued that this is one of the remaining sources of legitimacy for traditional, large law firms--they act as a sort of "teaching hospital," taking young attorneys under their wing and gradually training them in the art and science of the law. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Here is the question the petition sought to raise:  “Whether, in a habeas corpus action brought by an individual held in United States territory, including Guantanamo, (a) Munaf v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 11:17 am by Record on Appeal
  Moreover, the court concluded that the County waived any argument that its interest in issues such as reducing teenage pregnancy, depression in young adults, and incarceration rates waived for failure to present the arguments (or a financial interest based on them) to the district court. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:26 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Next week, the Supreme Court will be hearing oral argument in Kentucky v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:48 pm by WIMS
"       The Appeals Court affirmed the district court's rulings on Southern Union's conviction, as set forth in United States v. [read post]