Search for: "v. JONES"
Results 6921 - 6940
of 9,905
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm
See Kurtz v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:51 pm
In "Minnow Microsoft v the Google Giant", posted on the BBC website today, Rory Cellan-Jones writes on the competition-based complaint lodged by Microsoft with the European Commission. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:57 pm
Jones, a Federal judge of the U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:02 am
In Jones v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am
., Petitioners, v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:19 am
United States Court of Appeals CRIMINAL OPINIONS Habeas Corpus Confrontation Clause Where a state court judge admitted double hearsay against a defendant as substantive evidence to prove the defendants’ guilt, his federal habeas corpus petition should have been granted. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 4:08 am
Supreme Court Duncombe & Ors v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2011] UKSC 14 (29 March 2011) Jones v Kaney [2011] UKSC 13 (29 March 2011) Lumba (WL) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 12 (23 March 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Folgate London Market Ltd v Chaucer Insurance Plc [2011] EWCA Civ 328 (31 March 2011) W (Children) [2011] EWCA Civ 345 (30 March 2011) Societe Generale, London Branch… [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 2:52 am
Jones v Kaney [2011] UKSC 13; [2011] WLR (D) 109 “The immunity from suit for breach of duty that expert witnesses had previously enjoyed in relation to their participation in legal proceedings should be abolished. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:17 pm
Jones, 68 M.J. 465 (C.A.A.F. 2010). [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 1:37 pm
Vieira; Jones Day, and Stephanie E. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:11 am
KEYWORDS=google+books#articleTabs%3Darticle Ashby Jones, Banned Books? [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 9:03 am
This immunity has now been overturned by the Supreme Court of the UK in the decision of Jones v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:02 am
Although Jones v Kaney will be remembered as the case that abolished the immunity from suit of expert witnesses (at least in respect of claims brought by a litigant to whom the expert owed a duty), it is notable that this was not the only policy issue on which the divided (5-2) Supreme Court clashed. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:34 am
Jones v Kaney – read judgment/press summary. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:14 am
On appeal from: [2010] EWHC 61 (QB) The appellant in this case challenged the rule that an expert witness enjoyed immunity from any form of civil action arising from the evidence he or she gave in the course of proceedings. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:50 pm
In Buchanan County v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:57 pm
., Jones v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
In addition to the “threshold of seriousness”, the court can be asked to decide whether there is a “real and substantial tort” and, if there is not, to strike the claim out as an abuse: Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] QB 946. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:40 am
Jones, 80 U.S. 679, 728–29 (1871). [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 6:01 am
Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit in April will hear argument in Sony BMG Music Entertainment v. [read post]
