Search for: "Black v. State" Results 6941 - 6960 of 9,198
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Kaylo, No. 07-30024 Denial of a habeas corpus petition alleging that state prosecutors had committed Brady violations is reversed where the prosecution had withheld material impeachment evidence during defendant's manslaughter trial. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:25 am by Mandelman
Describing the NAACP’s alleged operations, the state maintained that the NAACP had (among other things) provided both financial support and legal aid to black students attempting to gain admission to the white-only University of Alabama. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am by Andy
The first concerns that dress which some people perceived as white and gold while others saw as black and blue. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 (See also: black box warnings on drugs.) [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
” On 2 July 2024, some arrived with placards stating: “Jurors have an absolute right to acquit a defendant according to their conscience. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Opposition is growing over State Government plans to extend defamation laws. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Arkansas advocacy groups sue the state for diluting black votes in violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act; they allege the state split black people into either hyper-concentrated districts or among multiple other districts where they're outnumbered. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 2 or Thursday 3 November 2011, the Court of Appeal (Hughes, Black and Tomlinson LJJ) will hear the appeal in the case of Cambridge v Makin. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
United States Alec Baldwin’s defamation lawsuit has been given the green light to head to trial. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Above all that, it was clearly wrongly decided, and illustrates how some judges have bad interpretive instincts when it comes to navigating the tricky but ultra-important voting rights realm.The case, Texas Democratic Party v. [read post]