Search for: "Doe v. Doe"
Results 6941 - 6960
of 137,455
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2010, 5:50 am
State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 10:22 am
Marina Pitofsky of USA Today reports that “Former Justice Stephen Breyer says he has ‘theories’ about who leaked opinion overturning Roe v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 9:49 am
" In cases such as South Dakota v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 12:18 pm
KSR Int'l v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 7:29 am
Today, SCOTUS handed down the decision in Flowers v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 6:49 am
Supreme Court heard oral argument in CFSA v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 12:01 pm
Stamm in Motor Vehicle Administration (MVA) v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 3:32 pm
On June 17, 2013 the Supreme Court announced its decision in Alleyne v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 9:15 am
Huynh v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 5:46 am
U.S. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 11:50 am
Supreme Court ruled inMiller v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 3:32 pm
On June 17, 2013 the Supreme Court announced its decision in Alleyne v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:00 pm
Its 5-4 ruling in McCleskey v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 7:51 am
United States v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 4:25 am
If Diehr remains good law, which it clearly does, and Mayo v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 8:40 am
See Mobile Diagnostic Group Holdings v. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 5:51 pm
As reported in an ACLU press release, earlier this week a Texas state trial court in Jane Doe v. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 4:00 am
In Chestnut v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 6:00 am
City of N.Y. v Hershkowitz, 308 AD2d 334, leave to appeal dismissed 2 NY3d 759, the Appellate Division explained that OSI is charged with investigating misconduct within the City of New York school district, which is not limited to misconduct committed by a DOE employee acting within the scope of his employment.The court noted that OSI had rationally determined that by posting the confidential student information at issue, which included transcripts, attendance records, and… [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 11:45 am
At the same time, the Appellate Division usually defers to the judgments of the SDHR when that agency does find discrimination.The case is In the Matter of State Division of Human Rights v. [read post]
