Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 6941 - 6960 of 8,637
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2010, 8:50 am by cornellvermontlaw
Indeed, the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California Constitution the notion that opposite-sex couples are superior to same-sex couples. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 6:07 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals does not think Henry has a compelling case, but that is not required in order for him to get a new trial. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm by Jeff Gamso
Indeed, the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California Constitution the notion that opposite sex couples are superior to same-sex couples. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 6:47 pm by Maxwell Kennerly
Indeed, the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California Constitution the notion that opposite sex couples are superior to same-sex couples. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:46 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
The first was "negligent marketing," which the Superior Court limited strictly to overpromotion:Appellant next argues that her claim for “negligent marketing” is cognizable under Baldino v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:18 pm
Indeed the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California constitution the notion that opposite sex couples are superior to same sex couples.'By those words and many others contained in the 138-page ruling in Perry v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:39 pm by David Lat
Indeed, the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California Constitution the notion that opposite-sex couples are superior to same-sex couples. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 6:48 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937 (2009), the Supreme Court noted the well-worn principle that Section 1983 does not recognize respondeat superior, but it also emphasized out of the blue that "a plaintiff must plead that each Government-official defendant, through the official's own individual actions, has violated the Constitution. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 12:00 pm by Bexis
Last week we reported on two recent decisions by the Pennsylvania Superior Court (an intermediate appellate court) in fen-phen litigation. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:03 am by gstasiewicz
Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that it has filed a new memorandum with the Superior Court for the State of Arizona in its legal pursuit of documents related to Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon’s taxpayer-funded security detail (Judicial Watch, Inc. v City of Phoenix (Civil Action CV2010-015452)). [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 9:39 am
Mungwarere, who appeared before the Ontario Superior Court in Ottawa (logo at left), is the 2d person to be charged under Canada’s Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act. [read post]