Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 6941 - 6960
of 7,360
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2008, 4:08 pm
The common law substituted judgment doctrine as applied to property issues dates back to the English Lord John Scott Eldon’s Court of Chancery in the early 1800s. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:18 am
U.S. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 12:48 am
And, As Judge Weinstein observed in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 9:19 am
Syndicate 980 v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 9:15 am
The recent judgment in Ace Capital Ltd v CMS Energy Corp [2008] EWHC 1843 (Comm) has provided welcome clarification on the effect of a US service of suit clause in a policy that contains an English arbitration provision.ACE (together with other subscribing underwriters) insured CMS under certain political risk insurance policies (the Policies). [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 6:20 pm
' BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY 953 (8th ed. 2004); see also Levine v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Oliveira Ardor New York Senior Broker Associate 2 Gina Berger Lower East End Realty Brokerage - Commercial / Investment Sales 2 Ariel Toledano ant propeties inc Brokerage - Residential 3 Michael Xylas Xylas & Ziccardi, LLP Real Estate Attorney 3 Tracy Mehlman Marcus and Millichap Brokerage - Residential 3 David Hale 50 State Building Advisors Executive Vice President 3 Venecia DeSilva upscalecorp@yahoo.com investor 2 John Choi … [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 12:11 pm
Blueport Co. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 4:09 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 5:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 12:49 pm
English, 902 So. 2d 836, 837 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 10:13 pm
., the second sentence of the opinion is: "These consolidated cases show again why the ten most terrifying words in the English language may be, 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help you.'"Chief Judge Kozinski: A funny guy. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 3:36 pm
The 9th does state that these cases "show again why the ten most terrifying words in the English language may be, 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help you.'" (9912). [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 4:13 pm
This can no longer be allowed in view of the comments in Bovemij Verzekeringen NV v Benelux Merkenbureau, Case C-108/05 [EUROPOLIS], which makes clear that the mark must be distinctive in the whole of the territory of the member state [Merpel would like a little clarification here: is this what Bovemij clearly established?]. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 8:00 am
Thanks to one of my loyal readers who often points out anti-concurrent cause cases for passing along the Colorado Court of Appeals July 24 decision in Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 8:00 am
Thanks to one of my loyal readers who often points out anti-concurrent cause cases for passing along the Colorado Court of Appeals July 24 decision in Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 8:03 am
(v) if those allegations were justiciable, should the court exercise its jurisdiction be exercised in this case? [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 3:18 am
Mihir's post is set out below:Recently, the Supreme Court of India in Severn Trent Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 6:07 pm
(This was the exact issue in Morrissey v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 1:04 pm
and here (New York State Bar Says No To Macs). [read post]
