Search for: "Grant v. State"
Results 6941 - 6960
of 68,540
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to… [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to… [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to… [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 8:36 am
It was granted. [read post]
U.S. District Court Vacates Personal Injury Defendant’s Default After Determining Good Cause Existed
3 Oct 2019, 1:03 pm
In Barbot v. [read post]
U.S. District Court Vacates Personal Injury Defendant’s Default After Determining Good Cause Existed
3 Oct 2019, 1:03 pm
In Barbot v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
Recently, I took note of the fact that the California Supreme Court as granted review of EpicentRx, In.c v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:35 pm
Hyatt, the Supreme Court has granted certiorari to decide whether Nevada v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 1:11 pm
Facts of the Case In the case of Marshall v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:25 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 9:15 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 9:40 am
See, e.g., United States of America v. [read post]
18 Nov 2017, 5:17 am
On July 26, 2017 the South Carolina Supreme Court, in the case of Doe v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 8:16 am
From the complaint in Allen v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
The case was Reynolds v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 11:34 am
Our Los Angeles marijuana lawyers, along with many others invested in medical marijuana rights, have been closely following the developments of The City of Riverside v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 9:01 pm
In the early days of the statute, federal courts granted nearly absolute deference to state court judgments. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:42 am
They were granted discretionary leave to enter and remain in the UK until the age of 17 years and six months. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:15 pm
Nunez v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
” A trial court granted the motion to suppress. [read post]
