Search for: "IN RE GUESS"
Results 6941 - 6960
of 16,480
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2013, 7:30 am
News articles about judges tend to present them as a bundle of emotions, I guess because newspaper editors imagine us readers to click where our emotions lead us.) [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 7:28 am
I have made every single mistake referred to above and though I would not go so far as to say (à la Paula Deen) that “If there’s anyone out there that has never said something that they wished they could take back, if you’re out there, please pick up that stone and throw it so hard at my head that it kills me,” I would guess that I do not stand alone on this. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:17 am
He asked about a “hypothetical tribe” with a “zero percent blood quantum” that is “open for, you know, people who want to apply, who think culturally they’re a Cherokee or - and number of fundamentally accepted conversions. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 2:21 pm
My Five Takeaways From the Trial (by Jordan Rushie, who represented one of the Doe defendants) Related posts: P2P Infringement Lawyer Faces Possible Sanctions For Disregarding Court Order Regarding Subpoenas – In re: Bittorrent Adult Film Copyright Infringement CasesNew York Judge *Slams* Bittorrent Copyright Plaintiffs – K-Beech; Malibu Media; and Patrick Collins v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:00 am
I guess I should make more of an effort to get Two to be more engaging online between now and my next LA trip. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:16 am
By David RangavizIn re K.F., 2013 VT 39Family law cases are almost invariably heartwrenching. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 9:15 am
* In re Skinner, 740 S.E.2d 171 (Ga. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 5:18 pm
Guess what? [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 10:36 am
Guess what the goal to be achieved is before you click through. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 9:23 am
And guess what? [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 5:01 am
I remember being greeted by Sister Anna Marita with something along the lines of, “So you think you’re smart? [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 2:47 am
I guess it just wants to preserve the record for an appeal and avoid doing anything that looks like recognizing that it's entitled to only a small royalty amount. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 4:00 am
Sometimes they’re right and sometimes they’re wrong. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 10:41 pm
Thus the court properly refused to second guess an expressly stated term of the policy based on public policy arguments. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 6:10 am
Guess I’m 70-ish. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:00 am
More back-seat drivers for the major legal publishers. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 12:55 pm
They are asking that question: Why should I care. it must grab their attention — will help them make money –will it save money – tell them it is easier or more enjoyable – tell them tell them early, often and clearly don’t leave them guessing. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 9:47 am
We’re all wondering what direction the legal profession is heading. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 8:12 am
You’re stuck with me for a while. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 4:57 am
Dual-format release is the way to go, I guess, at least in the areas where PDF can justify its existence. [read post]
