Search for: "Parks v. State"
Results 6941 - 6960
of 10,183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 10:33 am
The Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) stated reason for Take Back Day is to “provide opportunity to prevent drug addition and overdose deaths. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 3:32 pm
The Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) stated reason for Take Back Day is to “provide opportunity to prevent drug addition and overdose deaths. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 5:59 am
”]The life jackets had been collected from refugees who had reached Europe via the Greek island of Lesbos, and Ai Weiwei’s stated intention behind the installation was to shine a light on the humanitarian crisis sweeping the continent as thousands of refugees arrived, having fled their homes in the search of a better life.In August 2017, the Danish Volkswagen importer (‘Volkswagen’) took a photo of the new Volkswagen Polo, conveniently parked in front of the… [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 8:09 am
Orchard Park finished a perfect 13-0 season on Sunday by capturing the state championship title in Syracuse. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:21 pm
The State’s suggestion, p. 18 pf the reply brief, that the statement’s “primary purpose” is not prosecutorial because it was informal should be rejected on grounds already indicated in Davis v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:21 pm
The State’s suggestion, p. 18 pf the reply brief, that the statement’s “primary purpose” is not prosecutorial because it was informal should be rejected on grounds already indicated in Davis v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 5:43 am
State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm
KRISTINA PASCARELLA AND ANNA D’ ANTONIO, Petitioner,v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 10:01 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:25 am
State v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Issue: Whether under United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am
Forty-five years ago, the baseball world trained its attention on the Wisconsin Supreme Court and its impending decision in the case of Wisconsin v. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 9:17 pm
v=IzuGw4km4v8#t=2h19m20s J. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 4:16 am
Such decisions as Cameron v Auto Club and DeVillers v. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 2:54 am
Ergul said in his plea agreement that in June 2022 – following the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm
Supreme Court in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:36 pm
In Baker v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 141, Dyson LJ, at paragraph 31, Sir John Dyson emphasised that the section 71(1) duty was not a duty to achieve the result of eliminating racial discrimination as such, or to promote equal opportunity, but a duty to have “due regard” to the need to achieve these goals. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 7:17 am
Trulock v. [read post]
