Search for: "State v. Click" Results 6941 - 6960 of 10,830
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2011, 1:52 pm by Paul A. Prados
  Most observers readily state that the makeup of the panel has significant effect on the outcome.A rocky time for Liberty U.The matter of Liberty U. v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:25 am by Tomassi Law Associates
For coverage of the May 6 sale procedures hearing, click here. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:46 am by Josh Wright
This is why the vast majority of user clicks are on the top three or four results. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:13 pm
Fourthly, in assessing the distinctive character of the mark in question the General Court distorted the relevant facts and did not sufficiently state the reasons for its judgment. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Consequently, the fact alone that the request comprising claim 1 with the features (I) to (V) was submitted and subsequently withdrawn in the first instance proceedings is for the board a sufficient reason not to admit the main request and auxiliary request, both comprising claims with features which are essentially the same as the features (I) to (V), into appeal proceedings. [read post]
9 May 2011, 1:38 am
 C-281/10 P PepsiCo v Grupo Promer Mon Graphic (click here for details of the General Court's decision and here for the grounds of appeal). [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:29 am
Click On http://nylayoff.blogspot.com/ for additional information about this electronic reference manual. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:32 pm by WIMS
"       Access the complete opinion and dissent (click here). [read post]