Search for: "State v. Self" Results 6941 - 6960 of 15,623
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2016, 8:15 am
But Chambers does not go so far as to hold that a defendant is denied a fair opportunity to defend himself whenever a state rule  excludes favorable evidence, see United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm by familoo
We have seen the Northern Irish Supreme Court Justice Lord Kerr suggesting that Article 3 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child ought to be directly applicable, and the Supreme Court applying it in Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47 (8 July 2015). [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 10:39 am
•       State control of the fundamental means of production (¶ 63) legitimating/democratizing (¶¶64-65)•       Highest objective: Preserving the state and Revolution (¶¶66; 72)•       Central Planning  is the principal means of socialist development (¶6 [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 8:36 am by Dan Tench and Lucy Hayes, Olswang LLP
This is relevant to the judgment in Patel v Mirza (which had not been released at the date of our interview) relating to illegality: “The whole issue of how the Courts approach illegality as a defence to claims in contract and tort has been, to a degree, shaped by the Law Commission’s work on that area of law. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 7:17 am by Susan Hennessey, Nicholas Weaver
The FBI learned, through a foreign partner, a website dedicated to the distribution of child sexual abuse materials was determined to be located within the United States. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 3:48 am by SHG
There is bad law, terrible law, like Graham v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 7:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But in this case, the State Court of Appeals did hear the case and it upheld the conviction. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 10:02 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
Requirements of a Valid Entrapment Claim In this case, the Arizona Supreme Court outlined the requirements needed to make a valid claim of entrapment: Citing State v. [read post]