Search for: "Test Plaintiff"
Results 6941 - 6960
of 21,971
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2018, 5:42 am
In 2013 and 2014 the plaintiff, a deputy with the Washington County, Nebraska, Sheriff’s Office ran against the incumbent for the sheriff’s position. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 5:10 am
To the extent that these factors are involved, "Puppies" is the product of plaintiff's artistic creation. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 5:10 am
To the extent that these factors are involved, "Puppies" is the product of plaintiff's artistic creation. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 8:45 pm
The tribunal must look at the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
Instead, the plaintiff must show that the deviation was a direct cause of his or her harm. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 6:10 am
(Neither R.C. 2307.92 nor R.C. 2307.93 place any burden on a party to submit a written report and supporting test results to demonstrate that he or she is a non-smoker.) [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 3:31 am
The plaintiff and defendant were the sole witnesses at trial. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 3:00 am
The NAACP also had been looking for a test case about segregation on Montgomery’s bus system, but a first potential test case wasn’t feasible when its prospective plaintiff was found to be pregnant. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 11:50 am
Plaintiff appealed to the California Court of Appeal.. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 11:48 am
“The Lindsay Defendants owed a duty of reasonable care in the design development, testing, manufacture, assembly, inspection, marketing, distribution, promotion, training, advertisement and sale of the Subject Guardrail so as to avoid exposing Plaintiff to unnecessary and unreasonable risks,” the lawsuit states. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 11:48 am
“The Lindsay Defendants owed a duty of reasonable care in the design development, testing, manufacture, assembly, inspection, marketing, distribution, promotion, training, advertisement and sale of the Subject Guardrail so as to avoid exposing Plaintiff to unnecessary and unreasonable risks,” the lawsuit states. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Consequently, we must adopt a test identifying which omissions or nondisclosures fall within the scope of the CLRA. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Consequently, we must adopt a test identifying which omissions or nondisclosures fall within the scope of the CLRA. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 9:31 am
They publish textbooks, assessments, test banks, and a wide variety of other learning tools for teachers and students. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 4:31 am
Defendants First Solar, Inc., were accused of committing several fraudulent acts, which caused the plaintiffs who purchased First Solar stock to suffer great economic loss. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 11:53 am
They may also be held vicariously liable (meaning plaintiff does not need to prove negligence) as long as plaintiffs can show the trucker was negligent and was acting in the course and scope of employment at the time of the crash. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 7:27 am
Defendant simply argues that, 'reasonable or not,' it didn’t have an 'intent to deceive.' But this is not the test for evaluating . . . [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 4:47 am
Lukács failed to meet the tests for private interest standing and public interest standing as developed by and for courts of civil jurisdiction. [2] The question is whether the Agency’s decision was reasonable. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 4:16 pm
Dukes, 564 U.S. 338 (2011) (reversing the lower court’s certification of a class of one and one-half million female plaintiffs alleging sex discrimination under Title VII because the plaintiffs’ claims lacked commonality). [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 12:15 pm
The judge correctly recognized the political litmus test the state was imposing on Esther: Plaintiff’s harm stems not from her decision to refuse to sign the certification, but rather from the plainly unconstitutional choice the Kansas Law forces plaintiff to make: She either can contract with the state or she can support a boycott of Israel. [read post]
