Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 6941 - 6960
of 13,652
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
" --Michael Parenti, final remarks, California State University, Channel Islands, March 11, 2004.IntroductionOur nation is awakening to the fact that convenience-oriented industrial food products, which have substantially displaced our traditional diet, have altered our collective health for the worse. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 7:41 am
Well, on July 1, 2011, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, waded into the controversy. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:07 pm
” Norgart v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:19 pm
In City of Ontario v Quon, 130 S. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 3:44 am
The US Supreme Court’s decision a couple of weeks back in Citizens United v. [read post]
9 May 2008, 1:00 am
Although self-described as an alternative assessment of the impact of recent Supreme Court punitive damage decisions, the article ultimately echoes the refrain advanced by, among others, members of the defense bar immediately following the United States Supreme Court's decision in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:33 am
For example, the United States Supreme Court has held that illegal contract provisions are void. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am
United States, 491 U.S. 617, 624-25 (1989) (noting and accepting the government’s concession on this score); United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 12:06 pm
Dobbs v. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 3:28 am
NAC was found liable on a breach of contract claim in an underlying action against it in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 5:09 pm
As has been well-documented, the United States in the middle of an “epidemic” involving the abuse of prescription and non-prescription opioids. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm
In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is 'no.' [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:14 pm
In this Court, the parties and the United States as amicus curiae agree that the answer to this question is 'no.' [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 2:18 pm
Over 90 percent of abortions in the United States occur in the first trimester of pregnancy (before 13 weeks). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:35 am
Chavez v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 8:37 pm
As Douglas J., dissenting in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:36 am
Lyon (United States as a necessary party). * U.S. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 11:41 am
Nonimmigrants in valid V-1 or V-2/V-3 status or K-3/K-4 status who have an I-485 application pending also do not need advance parole. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:24 pm
The origin of this doctrine was hammered out in a 1908 United States Supreme Court case, Winters v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm
United States (No. 96-8986), in which the Court appointed now-Judge Jeff Sutton.) [read post]
