Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 6941 - 6960
of 13,652
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2014, 10:40 am
” But, in 1946, the Supreme Court abrogated that common-law understanding in United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 9:53 am
” Indeed, it is “the sole supplier of thermally buttfused PVC pipe in the United States. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:54 am
The mall filed suit in a California state court, alleging state-law claims for trespass and nuisance and seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
” State v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court wrote its Hollingsworth v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 10:21 am
During World War II, the United States Department of Defense converted the area into a naval station, which it operated until 1997. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:21 am
In 2010, it sued in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas alleging unauthorized interception and broadcast of the December 2007 "Undefeated" match between Floyd Mayweather and Ricky Hatton. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 5:38 am
Sirius XM Radio Inc., et al in the United States District Court, Central District of California [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 1:04 am
We covered this story back in July 2013 in our blog Tales From Topical Oceans Dean had argued that "the overall look and feel of [the Avatar world] Pandora substantially resembles a Roger Dean world in that Pandora's most striking and memorable features are those created by the Plaintiff" Now United States District Judge Jesse M. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 6:20 am
Ct. 945 (2012), and United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:47 pm
United States, 512 U.S. 452 (1994), and affirmed his conviction and sentence. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:45 am
District Court took up a loose end left by the Supreme Court’s holding in Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 8:30 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:26 am
(See Lasership, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 8:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:30 pm
The key law relied upon in the case, the Alien Tort Statute, requires, after a 2013 Supreme Court decision called Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum, that plaintiffs show that the matter “touch and concern” the United States in order for the case to proceed here. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:43 am
If this was a fair fight, I might bet on Apple and its technology, but the government of the United States of America does not believe in fair fights. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 6:20 am
Carnival Corporation et al., Case No. 2:12 CV 05517, filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 5:30 am
The recent cell phone case, Riley v. [read post]
