Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges" Results 6941 - 6960 of 16,271
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2015, 5:42 pm
See In re United States, No. 14–70486, 2015 WL 3938190, at *8 (9th Cir. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 6:40 am
 Standing is `an essential and unchanging part of the case-or-controversy requirement of Article III of the United States Constitution. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 5:07 am by Ben
Writing on behalf of the Court, Circuit Judge Richard Posner recalled the decision in Silverman v CBS, in which the 2nd Circuit held that when a story falls into the public domain, its story elements - including its characters - also do. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:37 am by Devin C. Reid
A panel of the United States Fifth Circuit consisting of Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Jolly and Graves recently issued a per curiam opinion regarding the effect of the Louisiana Underground Utilities and Facilities Protection Law (the “Louisiana One-Call Statute”). [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:37 am by Devin C. Reid
A panel of the United States Fifth Circuit consisting of Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Jolly and Graves recently issued a per curiam opinion regarding the effect of the Louisiana Underground Utilities and Facilities Protection Law (the “Louisiana One-Call Statute”). [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 2:09 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, and earlier this week the Supreme Court of the United States summarily denied her application for a stay. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:52 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Addressing the merits of the Title VII claim, the district court determined that his claim was controlled by the Supreme Court’s decisions in Johnson v Transportation Agency, Santa Clara County, California (480 U.S. 616 (1987)), and United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC v Weber (20 EPD ¶30,026 (1979). [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 12:44 pm by Greg Mersol
Much is being reported in the media about the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California certifying a class of drivers for the Uber ride service who contended that they were employees, not independent contractors. [read post]