Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 6961 - 6980
of 13,887
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2020, 8:52 am
But here, the DEA argues in U.S. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 8:59 am
The Court’s recent decision in CALPERS v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 8:59 am
The Court’s recent decision in CALPERS v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 7:05 pm
The court in State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 11:47 pm
In Pate Estate v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 10:03 am
On September 24, 2020, in EEOC v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:00 am
” State of Illinois v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 4:40 pm
" Nixon v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 11:40 am
(1) Single click of website link close in time to when the link was posted supported probable cause under the totality of circumstances; (2) Information supporting search warrant was not stale; (3) Officers were entitled to good-faith reliance on the warrant U.S. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am
Copyright Royalty Board, 970 F.3d 418 (2020) Illustrates that the increased judicial skepticism of administrative lawmaking may well be coming for certain Copyright Office functions as well. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:27 pm
Rutti v. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 6:57 am
State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 7:31 pm
In Desert Survivors v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 3:18 am
Div., 256 AD2d 792Rodriguez v Commissioner of Labor, App. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) R. v Villeneuve, 2023 NLCA 14 [1] This appeal addresses two questions: when an encounter between a police officer and the respondent, Nicholas Villeneuve, became a psychological detention for the purposes of triggering Mr. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
The Supreme Court weighed in as well, and on July 24, 1974, Chief Justice Burger announced the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:14 am
v=eTnHjYOFuB4"} ) CITIZENS UNITED WON'T GET SECOND LOOK Arizona's law wasn't all the high court tackled. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 4:08 am
An individual began working as a safety officer for the Office of Mental Health and subsequently entered an inpatient rehabilitation program for alcohol abuse. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 11:44 am
The case is Associated Builders and Contractors of Southeast Texas v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 12:53 pm
Courts have regularly applied the rationality standard in upholding special conditions requiring convicted sex offenders to secure residences approved by the Division of Parole prior to release from DOCS custody to parole supervision as in Breeden v Donelli, Lynch v West, Billups v New York State Division of Parole and Wilson v Keane. [read post]
