Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 6961 - 6980
of 8,963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2011, 3:00 am
The Bottom Line: “We next address whether CMC is nevertheless immune from tort liability under section 29-20-205(1), the discretionary function exception. [read post]
12 May 2011, 10:15 am
According to this Reuters story, Rajaratnam could get up to 25 years in prison, although, as the Reuters story points out, prosecutors on Wednesday said the sentencing guidelines call more for something in the 15 1/2 to 19 1/2-year range. [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:28 pm
”[20] Essentially, one of those is required for Walker Process standing, otherwise the plaintiffs are “donning the cloak of a Clayton Act monopolization claim…. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:46 am
“Mere size does not demonstrate competitive harm. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:25 pm
The ITC ruled that Apple does not infringe patent claiming multitouch technology. [read post]
9 May 2011, 11:17 am
The present document does not affect immovable property. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
In 2009, when TG was 20 and in need of housing assistance, following contact from TG's solicitors, Lambeth decided he was not a 'former relevant child' under section 23C(1) Children Act 1989 and that he was therefore not owed the continuing duties. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
In 2009, when TG was 20 and in need of housing assistance, following contact from TG's solicitors, Lambeth decided he was not a 'former relevant child' under section 23C(1) Children Act 1989 and that he was therefore not owed the continuing duties. [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am
In an order filed April 1, the 11th U.S. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:35 am
Yet sometimes the truth is too simple for some … The Warren Commission thought they had an open and shut case: three bullets, one assassin – but two things happened that made it virtually impossible: 1)the Zapruder film which you just saw, and 2)the third wounded man, Jim Tague, who was nicked by a fragment down by the Triple Underpass. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:35 am
Last week I discussed how documentaries teach us to use different types of media to keep the jury’s attention. [read post]
5 May 2011, 11:36 pm
New York Governor Patterson signed a new law on October 20, the “Access to Justice in Lending Act” (Chapter 550 of the Laws of 2010), which allows defendants who are [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:17 pm
— 31 (1)? [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:49 pm
Or, as a Canadian court put it:I do agree . . . that mere proof of the existence of a Facebook profile does not entitle a party to gain access to all material placed on that site. [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am
The discharge of the person sought from custody pursuant to this Article explicitly does not prejudice subsequent rearrest and extradition upon later delivery of the extradition [read post]
4 May 2011, 7:52 am
His 20-year plus [read post]
3 May 2011, 4:02 pm
Martinez (Jan. 20, 2011, but only recently posted on Westlaw), plaintiff Elida Martinez was the common-law widow of Oscar Gomez. [read post]
2 May 2011, 2:00 pm
" Slip op. at 1. [read post]
1 May 2011, 7:22 pm
(or the week after)Some caveats:1. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:38 am
The Supreme Court’s ruling in this case therefore should provide greater guidance to lower courts regarding: (1) what elements plaintiffs must prove to trigger the presumption of reliance at the class certification stage, including whether plaintiffs must prove stock price impact tied to the operative misleading statements; and (2) the contours of plaintiffs’ initial burden of production and ultimate burden of persuasion when defendants present rebuttal evidence. [read post]
