Search for: "High v State"
Results 6961 - 6980
of 35,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2007, 4:51 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com]No. 07-5439 _________________________________ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________________________ RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners v. [read post]
3 Dec 2006, 8:56 am
The Supreme Court's 4-1 opinion in Angela Duncan v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 1:22 pm
In M.T. v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 4:02 pm
He reaffirmed the Court of Appeal’s finding in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1373 that the defendant’s state of mind is irrelevant to the tort of misuse of private information. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 9:25 pm
Florida a replay of United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 3:39 am
The IPKat posted a report earlier this week of the case Hospira v Cubist, in which three patents belonging to Cubist were revoked by Mr Justice Carr. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 12:56 am
This sense of responsibility was exemplary, and I hope the United States District Court for the Northern District of California--sort of my other "home court"--will protect judges, court staff, counsel, parties, and a press pool member at a comparably high level when the Epic Games v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:28 am
But that was before the Supreme Court decided Walker v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 11:38 am
Re the Supreme Court's June 11th opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 9:54 am
In Fertel v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:45 am
Today's DJ offers Retiring State High Court Justice Lauded by Colleagues, about how Justice Werdegar (who will retire this summer) "received celebratory plaudits from her high court colleagues at her penultimate oral argument session" yesterday in San Francisco. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:44 am
A decision a week or so ago, Gelumbaukskas v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:00 pm
IP Australia’s decision comes on the heels of the High Court of Australia’s approval of the Full Federal Court decision in Commissioner of Patents v RPL Central Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 177 (RPL Central) on 5 May 2016. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 4:03 pm
Here, as in Sanderson [v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:46 pm
Flores v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 3:30 am
Youtsey v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 1:43 am
The cross-licence is governed by the laws of the state of California. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:59 am
The KwaZulu Natal High Court in Eagle Creek Investment 138 (Pty) Ltd v Hibiscus Coast Municipality and Another [2010] ZAKZDHC 24 (16 July 2010) gave developers an unusual warning. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:37 am
I have been keeping my eye out for an article on the CIGNA Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 8:36 am
Workers compensation lawyers and legal practitioners are sitting on the edge of their seats awaiting the ruling of the Supreme Court in the high profile case of Castellanos v. [read post]
