Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 6961 - 6980
of 21,107
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2018, 3:15 am
https://t.co/qON7cBbxla 2018-06-05 Breach of confidence claim can be brought by person in possession Sinel v Hennessy [2018] JCA 095 https://t.co/NHNe9eY0Po 2018-06-05 Canadian companies could face millions in fines for violating EU-enforced data privacy regulations https://t.co/maVny8F2HY 2018-06-05 Fake news week: three stories that reveal the extreme pressure journalism is now under – Richard Sambrook https://t.co/T595gnAcdj 2018-06-05 Solex : Lexum’s Latest Search Engine… [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 9:26 am
Ultimately, the court determined that the defendant was not liable. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 6:16 am
Hazards Must Be Non-Obvious or Unavoidable In Arizona, defendants cannot be held liable for injuries caused by hazards that were obvious or avoidable — they can only be held liable for hazards that were concealed in some way such that reasonably prudent motorists would not have discovered the hazard before it was too late to avoid it. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 1:25 pm
SB 1038 would make an employee who intentionally retaliates against a person who has filed a complaint, testified, assisted in any proceeding, or opposed any prohibited practice, under FEHA, jointly and severally liable, regardless of whether the employer knew or should have known of that employee’s retaliatory conduct. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 9:00 am
Aereo, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 3:55 am
In Nathan’s view, the settlement is “fair, reasonable and adequate”.Austrian Court Finds in Preliminary Ruling that YouTube is Liable for Copyright Infringement In the ongoing debate whether online platforms can be liable for copyright infringement, the Commercial Court in Vie [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 5:17 pm
First, the defendant must be a provider or user of an interactive computer service. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 6:14 am
“Ledesma provides causation is established for purposes of California tort law if the defendant’s conduct is a ‘substantial factor’ in bringing about the plaintiff’s injury,” Cargain said. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 5:17 am
Following dismissal of Bastei Lübbe’s action at first instance on grounds that the defendant could not be deemed to have committed the relevant infringement, the case reached the District Court Munich I.The Munich court appeared keen on holding Strotzer liable by means of a presumption under German law. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:44 pm
The Facts of the Case The plaintiffs purchased a used car from the defendant dealership “as-is. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:04 pm
Defendants’ attorney says that while they are sympathetic to the family, they do not believe their client is legally responsible, the same way Budweiser wouldn’t be held liable for a drunk driving accident. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:04 pm
Defendants’ attorney says that while they are sympathetic to the family, they do not believe their client is legally responsible, the same way Budweiser wouldn’t be held liable for a drunk driving accident. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 11:45 am
[It's true what they say then - the devil really is in the detail!] [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 8:53 am
The jury also found defendants Dent and Johnson jointly and severally liable for an additional 3,813 false claims, worth $467,935, submitted by Singulex. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
Therefore, it’s your responsibility to prove that the accused is indeed liable for the death of your loved one. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:34 pm
The Facts of the Case A couple bought a used car from the defendant dealership. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:34 pm
The Facts of the Case A couple bought a used car from the defendant dealership. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 9:02 am
The Facts of the Case The plaintiff was shopping with her husband at the defendant grocery store. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 9:02 am
The Facts of the Case The plaintiff was shopping with her husband at the defendant grocery store. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 7:53 am
This was part of employer’s defense. [read post]
