Search for: "Likely v. State"
Results 6961 - 6980
of 82,323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2010, 7:20 am
Check the Carr v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 8:52 am
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for further consideration in light of Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 11:17 am
Caperton v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 2:22 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court faced this question in State v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 4:45 pm
Yet, a scant eight years after Arizona, in Kansas v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:07 pm
This requires the restriction to respond to a “pressing social need”, for relevant and sufficient reasons; and to be proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued by the State. viii) As with all Convention rights that are not absolute, the State has a margin of appreciation in how protects the right of freedom of expression and how it restricts that right. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:33 pm
In the Davis v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 4:10 am
Since the SCOTUS decisions in United States -v- Windsor and Hollingsworth -v- Perry last summer, the civil rights push for same-sex marriage equality has picked-up momentum throughout the country. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 12:36 pm
Maleng or Granholm v. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 9:46 am
In Feeney v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 7:29 am
Georgia—death penaltyUnited States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 8:13 am
Bouzari v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 2:07 pm
The Texas Supreme Court issued an opinion today in Energy Transfer Partners, L.P v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Freeman v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:36 am
Ryll v. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 11:07 am
Lozano v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 8:26 pm
Although decided over two decades apart, United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:08 am
Qualcomm and Oracle v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 8:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 9:56 pm
This retrospective study, like the original, makes clear that election reform remains an uncompleted task more than two full presidential election cycles after Bush v. [read post]
