Search for: "People v. Powers"
Results 6961 - 6980
of 15,377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:49 am
In Dalia v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:06 pm
Clear coverage: Transunion v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:46 am
Our personal data and the ways private companies harvest and monetize it plays an increasingly powerful role in modern life. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:25 pm
What’s Happening in Washington Dan Jaffe, Executive Vice President, Government Relations, ANA It’s within our power to affect how present challenges are resolved. [read post]
[Ilya Somin] Federal Court Again Rejects Texas' Claim that Illegal Migration Qualifies as "Invasion"
28 Apr 2024, 3:09 pm
Among other things, if Texas prevails on the invasion question, border states would have broad power to start wars with neighboring countries, and the federal government could suspend the write of habeas corpus (and thereby detain people without filing charges) virtually anytime it wants. [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 4:19 am
This is a Marbury v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 8:01 am
"] From Justice Frankfurter's concurrence in Dennis v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
Its decision yesterday in Thibodeau v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
I powers. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 5:17 am
In Malandrucco v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 11:33 am
In Bartnicki v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 6:30 am
Casey and Roe v. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 10:52 pm
I doubt they reached huge numbers of people, but certainly some of the powers that be. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
Therefore, the model can’t justifiably be employed by a judge who claims to apply originalist methods and used as the basis for a legal rule about how federal and state power interact today. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:24 am
Chief Justice Roberts appears particularly in tune with the exercise of national power. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:50 pm
See also California v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 8:40 am
That’s the people’s job. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:16 am
We note, however, that such questions were improper (see People v Paul, 229 AD2d 932; People v Paul, 212 AD2d 1020, 1021, lv denied 85 NY2d 912; People v Edwards, 167 AD2d 864, lv denied 77 NY2d 877). [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 11:33 am
(Eugene Volokh) Haley v. [read post]
