Search for: "Personality Productions, Inc."
Results 6961 - 6980
of 12,377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2014, 11:12 am
Lexington’s claim person orally advised Wellons that Lexington would provide a defense under a reservation of rights. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 4:22 am
Google, Inc., No. 12-16752 (9th Cir. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 2:58 pm
| BREAKING: Unanimous Supreme Court in Samsung v Apple finds that damages may be based on a component, not whole product | (Belatedly) remembering Raymond Niro, the most influential person in patent litigation whom you may have never heard of | Genuine use of three dimensional EU trade marks - heated arguments over ovens | Wild Boys Sometimes Lose It: Duran Duran fail to reclaim their US copyright |Around the IP Blogs Never Too Late 125 [week ending on Sunday 4 December] |… [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:06 am
This tome, edited by a three-person team consisting of Sanghoon Ahn, Bronwyn H. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 2:32 pm
Image from hereOn July 5, 2013, the IPAB upheld the decision of the Controller against grant of patent to Monsanto Inc. for a method of producing plants which can withstand harsh environmental conditions. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
Sanofi-Aventis, U.S., Inc., 2015 WL 3648911 (D.N.J. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 7:32 am
Procedural HistoryBarnes & Noble, Inc. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
The applicability of Merchandising Corporation of America Inc v Harpbond Ltd [1983] FSR 32 was raised, where it was found that the facial makeup of Adam Ant was not protectable as it was not fixed in a tangible medium, and could be washed off. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:02 am
Consumer-survey data taken at the same time as the N.F.L. cases showed widespread belief among consumers that “[n]o product can bear the name of an entertainer, cartoon character, or some other famous person unless permission is given for its use”—a belief that appears to have come from what they thought the law required. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 3:43 am
But each of the companies counts as a "person" under the Trademark Act. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:58 am
Ortho McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., No. 3:12 oe 40001, 2014 U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:37 am
Sensory copyright finally makes its way to CJEU | Big Data, products & processes: being a German patentee in the era of the Rezeptortyrosinkinase decisions | Life as an IP Lawyer: Singapore | Appointed Person issues first appeal decision in a design case | The meaning of "red carpet" in two and three dimensions: from Ancient Greece to Cannes | Judge Alsup driving forward Uber-Waymo trade secret dispute amongst… [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 5:35 am
See, e.g., Totes, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc., Civ. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
IMS Health Inc.], 2653 (2011) 131 S. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:52 pm
In furtherance of these priorities, the EEOC and other federal agencies both have expanded regulatory protections for persons with disabilities and significantly stepped up investigation and enforcement of disability discrimination claims against businesses accused or suspected of discriminating against disabled or other persons protected under federal discrimination laws. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 7:24 am
Lenovo, Inc and Fujitsu America, Inc. 09-cv-81046, S.D. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 10:01 am
[i] Smithfield Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 9:11 am
Electric Eel Manufacturing Company Inc., et al., Feb. 10, 2021, U.S. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 6:26 pm
WYNDHAM VACATION RESORTS, INC., Appellant, v. [read post]
