Search for: "Petite v. United States" Results 6961 - 6980 of 13,105
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2014, 9:47 am by Sean Cornely
On February 11th, the three private plaintiff-appellants and eleven State plaintiff-appellants in State National Bank of Big Spring, et al. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
In Board of Directors of The Colchester Towne Condominium Council Of Co-Owners, v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 6:54 am by Joy Waltemath
” The complaint, Burton v United Auto Workers, was filed in a federal district court in Tennessee. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 12:01 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
United States 13-632Issue: Whether forensic pathology reports are testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 11:12 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Last month, a political activist posted hidden camera footage taken during oral argument in McCutcheon v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:39 am by Benjamin Wittes
District for the Northern District of California seeking, as it wrote in its brief: a temporary restraining order and, after a hearing has been held, an order prohibiting, enjoining, and restraining defendants National Security Agency, United States of America, Department of Justice, Barack H. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:00 am by John Elwood
Stephens, 13-6646, a one-time relist in which a pro se petitioner (in gaol for having a bit too much o’ the green) argued that he was denied counsel at a “critical stage” of his criminal proceedings in violation of United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 9:14 am by Ronald Mann
I should add, in the interest of candor, that I worked on the brief and presented oral argument on behalf of the United States in Dewsnup v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
On March 10, 2014, the Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 9:31 am
Commissioner of Correction (Habeas; "On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court erred in denying his petition because his 'constitutional right to the effective assistance of trial counsel, under the [s]ixth and [f]ourteenth [a]mendments to the United States [c]onstitution, was violated.' [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 5:13 am by Amy Howe
” The Text & History Blog of the Constitutional Accountability Center discusses the cert. petition that the CAC recently filed in Jackson v. [read post]