Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 6961 - 6980
of 41,391
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court decided the climate change case, American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 10:08 am
The United States Supreme Court today handed down its long-awaited decision in New Process Steel L.P. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 7:11 am
There is an interesting case going on in the Ninth, United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:32 am
Ricci v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:30 pm
On April 18, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 12:35 pm
In South Carolina Department of Disabilities and Special Needs v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 12:55 pm
Max, Obodo v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Community Assn. v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Community Assn. v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 12:27 pm
As the Court has no power to re-write the statute to allow Respondent to be released under supervision and treatment pending trial, the Court declares those provisions of MHL § 10.06(k) unconstitutional. [read post]
9 May 2020, 9:38 am
State of Punjab and Ors. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Floresand Shelby County v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:28 am
The decision in Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association & Anr, v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 12:00 am
The Federal Circuit has recently decided the case of Power Integrations, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 2:27 pm
R (MK & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2011) CA (Civ Div) 14/4/2011 [Not on bailii, only a case note on lawtel]. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:58 am
Toth v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 2:27 pm
R (MK & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2011) CA (Civ Div) 14/4/2011 [Not on bailii, only a case note on lawtel]. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 12:28 pm
The judgment in Nandini Sundaram v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 12:28 pm
The judgment in Nandini Sundaram v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
At this blog, Marty Lederman discusses the impact of last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]