Search for: "State v Cooper" Results 6961 - 6980 of 8,568
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2013, 4:57 pm by Trey Childress
First, according to the Court in the Kiobel decision, ATS cases are subject to the presumption against extraterritoriality recently rearticulated in Morrison v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 5:25 pm
Supreme Court case, Kennedy v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 12:30 pm by Unknown
"Access to Health Care for Migrants Along the Mexico-United States Border: Applying a Framework to Assess Barriers to Care in Mexico," Frontiers in Public Health, 14 July 2022- Authors (6) = Mexico- APC = USD 3225"The Appropriation of African Indigenous Knowledge System in WASH Activities by Women at Tongogara Refugee Camp, Zimbabwe," Cogent Social Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1 (2022)- Authors (3) = South Africa- APC = USD 1270"Contraceptive Use, Menstrual Resumption, and… [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:37 pm by Florian Mueller
The saving (on what the developer owes Google) is just not going to make a difference.The same would happen in the U.S. if the Epic Games v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 6:05 am by Astrid Reisinger Coracini
Applying Yerodia, the Appeals Chamber of the Special Court for Sierra Leone (“SCSL”) ruled in its Decision on Immunity from Jurisdiction, Prosecutor v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat)   Global Global – General Moral… [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:58 am by Emma Snell
-Singapore cooperation on a number of issues, including the climate crisis and economic development, according to the statement. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
In both decisions, Judge Posner was on a panel with Chief Judge Easterbrook, so the intellectual lineup behind the opinions was as strong and fearsome as Billy Williams batting after Banks.Let’s start with United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 1:35 pm by Daithí
 Her key arguments were the divisions between criminal and civil issues (in particular, the role of contracts and terms of service), and she mentioned a number of key US decisions (such as the Lori Drew case and Register.com v Verio) and the problems stemming from then, including a pretty obvious circuit split (e.g. the difference between IAC v Citrin and LVRC v Brekka). [read post]