Search for: "State v. Bill" Results 6961 - 6980 of 19,699
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2011, 10:06 am by Tony Mauro
  The case echoes the dispute involved in the 2008 Supreme Court decision in Medellin v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 6:12 am by Ronald Mann
The Court next week will hear oral arguments in what may be the highest-stakes (at least in terms of dollars potentially at stake) case of the Term, Universal Health Services v United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 9:20 am by JB
In any case, lower courts have dismissed challenges to enrolled bills under Marshall Field v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:09 am by Eugene Volokh
Is it time to use Article V to amend Article V? [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 11:57 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
  The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
  The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:36 am by by PritzkerLaw
For those reasons -- and to protect Wisconsin's mainstream dairy industry from image problems --Governor Jim Doyle has vetoed a bill passed by the Legislature that would have allowed raw milk trade on state dairy farms, albeit with regulation and pathogen testing. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 2:01 am
First Act: 12/08/06 REFERRED TO RULESLast Act: 12/13/06 DELIVERED TO GOVERNORSame as A12121 Last Act: 12/13/06 substituted by s8515 12/13/06 DELIVERED TO GOVERNORS8518 RULES -- Relates to the crimes of vehicular assault and vehicular manslaughterSame as A 12120 RULES COM GanttSUMM : Amd SS1192, 1198-a & 511, V & T L; amd SS70.00, 120.04 & 125.13, Pen L Relates to the crimes of vehicular assault and vehicular manslaughter. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 12:46 pm by Brett Natarelli
On October 3, the second morning of its new term, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) heard oral arguments in the case of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 1:42 pm by Christine Dowling
  The high court ordered the Ninth Circuit to reconsider these cases in light of Swarthout v. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 2:17 am by Edgar (aka MrConsumer)
Regular reader and commenter Joel V. recently caught a bit of nasty fine print by Verizon Wireless in a new TV commercial. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 7:30 pm
As of now, however, state funded employers should anticipate no changes in their December 2008 or July 2009 premium bills. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:30 am
All of this hubbub surrounds the Supreme Court decision in the PLIVA v. [read post]