Search for: "State v. Character" Results 6961 - 6980 of 7,506
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 11:01 am
On this day in ...... 1893 (115 years ago today), in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 9:51 am
  Background Federal Courts, pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, review USPTO findings of fact under "the substantial evidence" standard, as a result of the Supreme Court's decision in Dickinson v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 2:35 pm
The I/P Updates blog has a a nice breakdown of the questions being referred to the EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal following the decision in Symbian Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 12:03 am
Vehbi Kahveci, head of the Intellectual and Industrial Property Rights Commission of the Istanbul Bar, stated that Batman (the character) and its related logos are already registered around the world. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 11:58 pm
Vehbi Kahveci, head of the Intellectual and Industrial Property Rights Commission of the Istanbul Bar, stated that Batman (the character) and its related logos are already registered around the world. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 11:36 am
In this piece I will discuss how if at all this provision has been altered by the case of Proctor and Gamble v Office for Harmonisation In the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) ; Known simply as "Baby Dry"; and subsequent cases. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:12 am
(Techdirt) Halliburton tries to patent form of patent trolling (Techdirt) (I/P Updates)(Law360) From 15 September, committing any crime can result in revocation of ‘privilege’ to prosecute before USPTO (Patent Prospector) USPTO to increase PCT transmittal and search fees (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) US Patents – Decisions Questions of fact re alleged enjoined imitations prevent contempt: Liquid Dynamics Corp v Vaughan (Chicago Intellectual… [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 10:17 pm
" I'm prompted to write about this subject based on a one paragraph Order by Judge Tennille earlier this year in Bank of America Corporation v. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 4:00 pm
" Mill responds: "It is 'to most persons' in the Slave States of America not a tolerable doctrine that we may sacrifice any portion of the happiness of white men for the sake of a greater amount of happiness to black men. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 7:32 pm
The solution is to create a one-off exception to the exclusionary rule for terrorists who attacked the United States in the past, a one-off return to the rule which prevailed prior to Mapp v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 1:38 pm
The dialogue is great, but who cares about Shelly Levine, the ostensible main character. [read post]