Search for: "State v. Register" Results 6961 - 6980 of 13,699
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am by Eleonora Rosati
The claimant said that by stating in their trade mark application their bona fide intention to use the mark, they caused the public to believe they were associated with the claimant. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 9:02 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Court] or branch in this state having jurisdiction in matters relating to the affairs of decedents. (9) “Descendant” of an individual means all of his [or her] descendants of all generations, with the relationship of parent and child at each generation being determined by the definition of child and parent contained in this [code].(10) “Devise,” when used as a noun means a testamentary disposition of real or personal property and, when used as a verb,… [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:58 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
The final rule was published in the Federal Register on September 11, 2015 (80 FR 54934-54977). [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 1:59 am
This trade mark was registered on 10 February 2012. [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:58 am by Becky
As such, it is much better to be the first to file (and register). [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 4:46 am
EU Regulations are directly effective in all member states. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 10:06 am
Now, presumably as part of a 2-for-1 deal, the General Court has refused DeepMind’s application to register an EUTM for STREAMS (Case T-97/18 DeepMind Technologies Ltd v EUIPO).In February 2016, Google Inc. filed an application (later assigned to DeepMind) to register STREAMS, for the following goods and services:Class 9: “Computer software for accessing and viewing patient medical information”; Class 42: “Application service provider (ASP)… [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 10:43 am
He advised the Court of Justice of the European Union to rule that the taste of a cheese - Dutch spreadable cheese Heks’nkaas (for which a patent was registered in 2012 and a word trade mark is registered)  - is not eligible for copyright protection as a 'work' under the InfoSoc Directive.While the outcome of the Opinion may be sensible, its content raises a number of issues and, potentially, problems.But, first, let's see how the AG… [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 8:42 pm by Madhulika Vishwanathan
 Moving on further, Aparajita highlighted the Bombay High court’s recent decision on Trademark infringement of SABMiller India Ltd. v/s Som. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 7:01 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
This finding was supported by the plan’s longevity, having been established and registered in 1974. [read post]