Search for: "State v. Stephens."
Results 6961 - 6980
of 7,112
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2007, 2:10 am
The Court's 24-page opinion in North American Catholic Educational Programming, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 3:15 pm
A federal appeals court in San Francisco ruled on May 15 in Fair Housing Council v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 8:03 am
Board of Trade, 06-1265), on the power of states to tax the interest on other states' municipal bonds (Kentucky Department of Revenue v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 12:53 am
By contrast, Thomas' neighbor on the bench, Justice Stephen Breyer, has uttered nearly 35,000 words since January. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
14 May 2007, 8:03 am
Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the dissenters, joined by Justices Stephen G. [read post]
13 May 2007, 12:31 pm
See United States v. [read post]
13 May 2007, 5:52 am
Hughes and Stephen Hughes v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 12:52 am
Splenda case, or, as it's officially known, Merisant Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 5:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 3:51 pm
Following graduation, Sprigman clerked for the Honorable Stephen Reinhardt of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and for Justice Lourens H. [read post]
7 May 2007, 2:48 pm
Reinhard v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 12:14 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Stephen Wettschurack v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 12:21 pm
NFP criminal opinions today (2): State of Indiana v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 12:25 pm
Stephen Karas, the former chief engineer of the M/V Tanabata (renamed the M/V Resolve) pleaded guilty to conspiracy and making false statements on March 29, 2007. [read post]
1 May 2007, 11:07 am
Stephen Bainbridge here rebuts, in a scholarly reply, a post by Prof. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 5:57 pm
Although the Supreme Court did not accept KSR's submissions in full, it unanimously agreed that they were correct on the facts of tbe dispute before it.On the background to this ruling and the TSM test, see Patently-O hereOn yesterday's ruling see Patently-O, Patent Baristas and and Duncan BucknellMicrosoft Corp v AT & T was a 7-1 ruling (Justice John Paul Stephens dissenting) that allowed Microsoft's appeal and agreed that the company should not be held… [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 11:19 am
Justice Stephen G. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
" Justices Stephen G. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 11:02 am
Answering that contention, the public defender for Stephen Danforth commented: "If the question presented was as settled as [the state] claims it to be, it is hard to imagine that courts in so many states would have gotten the law so wrong. [read post]
