Search for: "U. S. v. Mays"
Results 6961 - 6980
of 7,437
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
In Conway v. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 11:23 pm
"The title of a statute may be resorted to . . . only in case of ambiguity in meaning, and it may not alter or limit the effect of unambiguous language in the body of the statute itself" (McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes § 123 [a]). [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:28 pm
S. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 9:00 pm
New York, 404 U. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:33 am
Windows MS Office opinion: Mac Office 2008 sucks v. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 5:33 am
Well, they may be married to your U. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 8:27 am
[28] While such programs may not have been as successful as initially intended, that by no means that the idea is not viable. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
A party's failure to offer documentary support for his oral testimony may permit an adverse inference where it can be shown that the document exists, that it is under the party's control, and that there is no reasonable explanation for failing to produce it. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 12:06 am
United States, 406 U S 441, 92 S Ct. 1653, 32 L.Ed. 212 (1972), we recently reaffirmed the principle that the privilege against self-incrimination can be asserted in any proceeding, civil or criminal, administrative or judicial, investigatory, or adjudicatory. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:59 am
S. 230 (2006); Buckley v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:46 pm
Harris.While this case is sure to become a seminal mutual fund case, it's also likely to shed a great deal of light on the Court's disposition towards classical versus behavioral economic theory, the broader question of excessive compensation, and the ability of courts to evaluate dueling econometric analyses of market competition.The first -- and perhaps the broadest and most interesting -- ramification of Jones v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 3:22 pm
The second decision (also handed down last month) was from the Supreme Court of Canada in the Teck Cominco v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 8:13 am
On Monday the Supreme Court issued its decision in Vaden v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:05 am
Chadha, 462 U. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 9:56 pm
The applicant must be in one of the following categories at time of enlistment a. asylee, refugee, Temporary Protected Status (TPS), or b. nonimmigrant categories E, F, H, I, J, K, L, M, O, P, Q, R, S, T, TC, TD, TN, U, or V 2. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 5:55 pm
In reading Justice Alito’s dissent in Wyeth v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 11:35 am
The monthly tuition at the Bachelor Academy was $5,200.The U S. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 2:58 pm
Dodson, 454 U. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 2:07 pm
Wingo, 407 U. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 8:17 am
Rickey) in responding to Carney & Shepherd's criticism in Manufacturing Mystery: A Response to Professors Carney and Shepherd's "The Mystery of Delaware Law's Continuing Success (2009 U. [read post]
