Search for: "Williams v. A" Results 6961 - 6980 of 19,703
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2016, 7:21 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Closing argument by state — Failure of defense to object at trial Robert William Stone, Jr., appellant, was convicted following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Howard County on charges of attempted first-degree burglary, malicious destruction of property, resisting arrest, and unlawful taking of a motor vehicle. [read post]
10 May 2016, 11:04 pm by Raynold Tlhavani
The January 2016 determination of the Ombud for Financial Service Providers in Johannes William van Breda v Alesio Mogentale & Another is a good reminder of the powers of the Ombud where an FSP fails to respond to a complaint made against it. [read post]
10 May 2016, 6:37 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This pro se inmate wins his case against the State of New York, convincing the Second Circuit to reinstate his religious freedom case.The case is Williams v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 6:33 am
Williams, 249 A.D.2d 343, 344, 670 N.Y.S.2d 893 [2d Dept 1998], lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 883 [1998]; see also People v. [read post]
8 May 2016, 8:12 am by Howard Friedman
Washington Department of Corrections, (9th Cir., May 5, 2016), the 9th Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a suit complaining that prison officials inadvertently provided plaintiff a low-calorie meal on the first day of Ramadan 2010 before correcting the error.In Williams v. [read post]
7 May 2016, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
In V v Associated Newspapers [2016] EWCOP 21, published on 25 April, Mr Justice Charles, Deputy President and Judge in Charge of the Court of Protection, uses the word ‘prurient’ several times about the press coverage of earlier judgments in the case of ‘C’, the woman who ‘lost her sparkle’. [read post]
6 May 2016, 6:32 am by Daily Record Staff
Administrative law — Accidental disability benefits — Expert testimony We are asked to determine whether the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”), in determining whether appellant William Foard was entitled to accidental disability benefits: (1) improperly concluded that Foard was required to present expert testimony; and (2) applied the correct legal standard for causation. [read post]
6 May 2016, 3:37 am by SHG
It came after the Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. [read post]