Search for: "Young v. Young" Results 6961 - 6980 of 12,487
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2012, 2:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Consequently, the doctrine of continuous representation does not apply, and Supreme Court erred in denying the motion (see Gotay v Brietbart, 12 NY3d 894; see generally Young v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 4:52 pm
Ernst & Young, et. al., 2006 906 A.2d 168; 2006 Del. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 4:52 pm
Ernst & Young, et. al., 2006 906 A.2d 168; 2006 Del. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:12 pm by David Lat
According to Am Law Daily, the main BSF partners on the case are Lee Wolosky and Christopher Duffy, both fairly young partners. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:30 pm by NL
The Court considered R(M) v Slough BC [2008] UKHL 52 (our report here) as the leading case on s.21(1). [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:16 pm by Karwan Eskerie
(para 55) It was held to be relevant that the leaflets were left in the lockers of young people who were at an impressionable and sensitive age and who had no possibility to decline to accept them. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:49 am by Eric Goldman
” According to the plaintiffs, YouTube is liable because it provided a platform for Onision to reach young girls and because it shared advertising revenue with him. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
See also, Alvarez v Snyder, 264 AD2d 27 (1st Dept 2000), Iv denied 95 NY2d 759, cert denied sub nom Dim v Snyder, 531 US 1158 (2001); Finkelstein v. [read post]