Search for: "*u.s. v. Sharpe" Results 681 - 700 of 1,412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2019, 1:35 pm by Jim Walker
”  It constitutes a violation of MARPOL Annex V and potential felony violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 1:30 pm by WIMS
Domenici, Senior Fellow, Bipartisan Policy Center; former U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:09 am
He considers Kasie Brill’s (executive director of the Global Brand Council for the U.S. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 4:40 pm by Amul Kalia and Vera Eidelman
  Though this change appears to be part of PACER’s attempt to join the 21st Century—the removal is part of PACER’s migration to its NextGen system, which is incompatible with the decades-old legacy systems holding these records—it stands in sharp contrast to the Supreme Court’s acknowledgement in Nixon v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:13 pm by Florian Mueller
" She was outraged.I'm not outraged by Continental's latest procedural move because I'm merely watching its "antitrust case" against the Avanci patent pool firm and some of its licensors (Nokia, Sharp, Optis). [read post]