Search for: ". Kerr"
Results 681 - 700
of 6,253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2019, 4:46 am
Orin Kerr discusses here:From a practical perspective, this is a really important decision. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 3:01 am
Orin Kerr has more analysis at Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 10:44 am
” Orin Kerr has this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 2:49 am
In a new case, Taylor v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
As that well-known legal wag Orin Kerr put it, why bother? [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
The appeal was considered by Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 5:28 pm
Kerr, Rachel E. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 4:21 pm
Kerr. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 4:21 pm
Kerr. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
A late substitution What may also yet prove significant in defamation appeals to come is what Lord Kerr had to say regarding the vexed question of appellate courts substituting a new mea [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT The Supreme Court composed of President Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Sumption, Lord Hodge and Lord Briggs unanimously dismissed the appeal. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:30 am
Perhaps the best response was Professor Orin Kerr’s tongue-in-cheek Green Bag essay in which he documented that, in fact, the Bulgarians really only became interested in Kant’s pronouncements in the late-19th Century and even then mostly ignored his ideas as “obscure and awkward. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lord Kerr and Lord Sales. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 8:24 am
Jane Lambert Supreme Court (Lady Hale, Lords Kerr, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs) Actavis Group PTC EHF and others v ICOS Corporation and another [2019] UKSC 15 (27 March 2019) In The Cialis Litigation - Actavis Group PTC EHF and Others v Icos Corp and Another 4 Oct 2016, I discussed Mr Justice Birss's judgment in Actavis and others v Eli Lilly and Co [2016] EWHC 1955 (Pat) (10 Aug 2016) [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 1:05 pm
We consider the rule of law a fundamental value in our Canadian legal and constitutional systems; indeed, as the Supreme Court of Canada declared in the Secession Reference the rule of law is “a principle of profound constitutional and political significance” (para. 71) and “[t]he principles of constitutionalism and the rule of law lie at the root of our system of government. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:09 am
(See Lord Kerr’s summary of the grounds of challenge at paras 50-52) Lord Kerr commented that they were “serious charges” which would require “clear evidence” before they could be accepted. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:08 am
” (Quoted in para 44 (v) of Lord Kerr’s judgment) In the event a decision was made on 11 July 2011 that a public inquiry would not be conducted. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 2:30 pm
[Empirical SCOTUS] * Speaking of SCOTUS, it's high time for the Court to resolve the messy circuit split on email privacy under the Stored Communications Act, according to Orin Kerr. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 3:05 am
Courts have been struggling with this issue for years, and now the law is even more divided than before.The Stored Communications Act, a federal law governing e-mail privacy, is notoriously difficult to understand. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 9:29 am
I blogged about this case last year, and now I've filed a cert petition in the case.I recently wrote a long and detailed blog post about a new Fourth Amendment case from the Nebraska Supreme Court, State v. [read post]
