Search for: "A D
v.
State of Indiana"
Results 681 - 700
of 1,429
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2013, 1:25 pm
Indiana passed Act 1482, which increases the list of convictions eligible for expungement. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 6:51 am
Supp. 2d 999, (D. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 8:31 am
Law: US v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 11:25 am
However state law claims were permitted to proceed.In Jenkins v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
Playing with reality v. paper rights to compromise reflecting different systems. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 10:11 am
It argued that Yao v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 11:20 am
Florida v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
V. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am
These territories (present-day states of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and part of Minnesota) were essentially colonial possessions of the United States, and some American politicians favored treating them as such. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 12:15 am
Weinstein in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 5:59 am
That the General Assembly of the State of Indiana makes application to the Congress of the United States for a convention under Article V of the Constitution of the United States for the specific and exclusive purpose of proposing amendments to the Constitution of the United States to limit certain powers of Congress. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:30 am
In Gray v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 5:34 am
Supp.2d 1147 (D. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 10:57 am
Nebraska, 09CV456 (D. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 7:50 pm
The case of Hillman v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:41 pm
Connelly v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 6:58 am
Indiana was one of those states. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:08 pm
Reproductive choice in the hands of the state: the right to abortion under the European Convention on Human Rights in light of A,B & C v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am
Not a grant but, statistically speaking, the next best thing: the Court CVSG’d in the once-relisted Mount Holly v. [read post]
